Voters in South Dakota have rejected a proposed carbon pipeline project, dealing a setback to Summit Carbon Solutions. Despite the vote, Summit’s CEO, Lee Blank, remains determined to move forward with the project.
The Proposed Pipeline and Its Benefits
Summit Carbon Solutions plans to build a 2,500-mile carbon pipeline that will span multiple states, including South Dakota. The company has promised that the pipeline will allow farmers and ethanol producers in five states, including Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, and both North and South Dakota, to access billions of dollars in federal tax incentives.
Resistance and Challenges in South Dakota
The project has faced significant resistance in South Dakota. Farmers and landowners are particularly concerned about land acquisition rights and the potential disruption caused by the pipeline’s construction.
The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission had initially rejected Summit’s permit application, citing a lack of collaboration with landowners. In response, Blank emphasized that the company is working closely with landowners to find the best route and build stronger relationships.
Also read: Major Oil Firms Lobby to Protect IRA’s Carbon Capture Incentives
Setback with Referred Law 21
A recent setback came with the rejection of Referred Law 21, a bill designed to aid the pipeline’s approval. Opponents of the bill argue that the vote reflects bipartisan opposition to the pipeline project in the state.
Summit’s Plans Moving Forward
Despite these challenges, Summit Carbon Solutions remains committed to the project. Blank stated that the company plans to reapply for a permit with the state’s Public Utilities Commission. He emphasized the company’s efforts to maintain transparency and work closely with landowners to find an acceptable route.
Summit Carbon Solutions will continue engaging with landowners to address concerns and move the project forward, Blank added.
Also read: Japanese Companies Team Up for Innovative Carbon Capture and Storage Project
Opposition to the Pipeline
Opponents of the carbon pipeline project argue that the widespread rejection of Referred Law 21 signals growing concern and resistance. They believe the vote demonstrates that South Dakotans are united in their opposition to the proposed pipeline.