Singapore’s outlined conditions for approved international carbon credits have influenced the acceptance of REDD+ projects from Papua New Guinea, emphasizing a preference for jurisdiction-wide approaches over project-specific definitions, reported by Eco-Business. The Singapore Carbon credits impacts on international projects are significant.
REDD+ initiatives, aimed at “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation,” have faced scrutiny over environmental benefits linked to credits issued under Verra’s Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS), creating skepticism around forest conservation mechanisms and questioning Singapore Carbon credits impacts.
The Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) and the National Environment Agency (NEA) highlighted the variance in carbon crediting programs and methodologies within Singapore’s eligibility list, subject to agreements with host countries under implementation agreements. They acknowledged the diverse Singapore Carbon credits impacts on these programs.
Papua New Guinea stands as the sole host country listed following Singapore’s inaugural Article 6 agreement at COP28 in Dubai. Article 6, a pivotal aspect of the Paris Agreement, focuses on preventing dual counting of emissions reductions in carbon trading.
These approved credits, to offset up to five percent of carbon tax obligations for large emitters, underwent a revision to S$25 (US$19) per tonne from the current S$5 (US$4) and are slated to reach S$45 (US$34) per tonne by 2026. This highlights the economic impact.
However, Singapore’s adherence to stringent principles guiding the selection of overseas carbon credits has led to the exclusion of specific REDD+ projects under VCS’ project-based forest offsets.
The focus has shifted to endorsing only jurisdictional-based approaches, excluding methodologies within VCS’ “Sectoral Scope 14.”
Verra, in response to challenges to forest carbon offsets, is steering towards a jurisdictional approach, introducing a consolidated REDD+ methodology to ensure baseline consistency within and across jurisdictions.
This shift may impact existing methodologies under VCS, with several methodologies set for revision and deactivation by early 2024 due to Singapore Carbon credits impacts.
Eco-Business awaits clarification from MSE and NEA regarding potential revisions to include Verra’s new REDD+ methodology, emphasizing jurisdictional-level data as essential for future REDD+ projects.
Verra anticipates the transition of existing projects to its new methodology, expecting jurisdictional data availability by 2025.
The development signifies a transformative shift in carbon credit standards, emphasizing jurisdiction-wide approaches to enhance credibility and transparency in forest conservation initiatives.