BlackRock, a global investment firm, has announced its plans to leave the Net Zero Asset Managers(NZAM) project. BlackRock was one of the founding members of the initiative. The decision to leave the NZAM comes after increasing political pressure. As a result, this move is being marked as a win for anti-ESG politicians who have pressed the investment giant regarding its involvement with the group.
The NZAM initiative was launched in December 2020. At that time, 30 managers came on board. All of them combined managed $9 trillion in assets. Since its inception, the initiative has grown with over 325 signatories with $57 trillion in assets.
Approach to Sustainability
Despite leaving the NZAM, BlackRock will continue to have the same stance on sustainability. It will not alter its sustainability approach. BlackRock continues to prioritize climate conscious investments. It manages over $1 trillion in sustainable and transition investment strategies. The company emphasized that its portfolio management practices and client solutions remain aligned with its long term environmental goals.
Also read: Recurrent Energy Secures $500 Million Investment from BlackRock’s Climate Infrastructure Fund
The firm’s departure comes amid growing political pressure, particularly in the US where Republican politicians have been vocal in opposing ESG initiatives. BlackRock and other financial firms have been a target for legal scrutiny related to its involvement in climate focused investment strategies. Despite leaving NZAM, BlackRock asserts that its commitment to sustainable investing will persist.
Political Backlash and Legal Challenges
BlackRock’s exit from NZAM follows a series of challenges from state lawmakers, particularly in Texas. The firm, alongside Vanguard and State Street, faced a multistate lawsuit accusing them of manipulating energy markets and driving up costs. In its statement, BlackRock acknowledged that its membership in NZAM led to confusion and invited legal inquiries from public officials.
BlackRock’s exit from NZAM might mark a turning point in the the relationship between financial bodies and climate focused initiatives. Companies will continue facing scrutiny. The scrutiny will mostly be coming from supporting and critics of climate focused strategies.