The Supreme Court of Montana ruled that a right to a stable climate is guaranteed under the state constitution.The court overturned legislation that prohibited authorities from taking greenhouse gas emissions into account when authorizing fossil fuel projects, according to Reuters.
This is a significant legal victory for the 16 young activists who brought the lawsuit. The group of activists argued that the state’s actions, which contribute to climate change, endangered their health and futures. They argue that the state’s permitting of energy projects exacerbates the climate crisis.
Also read: Supreme Court to Hear Case on California’s Right to Set Tougher Emission Rules
Landmark Decision for Youth Activists
The Montana Supreme Court upheld a significant trial court decision. The court affirmed the young plaintiffs had the legal right to challenge Montana’s policies. This is the first time a US state supreme court has recognized the constitutional right to a stable climate in the context of fossil fuel projects. The 6-1 judgment determines a win for the youth led climate movement.
The case was based on a 2023 district court ruling by Judge Kathy Seeley. Judge Seeley decided that Montana’s constitution does guarantee the right to a clean and healthful environment. The verdict was based on an amendment to the constitution from 1972. The amendment mandates the state to protect and improve the environment.
State Defends Its Position
Austin Knudsen, the Republican attorney general for Montana, said he was disappointed by the decision. He emphasized that Montana is powerless to affect climate change on a global scale significantly. However, this idea was opposed by the majority of the state’s Supreme Court justices.
The natural systems in Montana, such as its water resources, air quality, glaciers, and forests, have already experienced considerable changes due to the state’s actions. This includes the endorsement of fossil fuel projects.
A Turning Point for Climate Litigation
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Nate Bellinger, called the ruling a confirmation of young people’s constitutional rights to a safe climate. According to him, the decision affirms the importance of protecting children’s future from fossil fuel interests.
This ruling in Montana adds to a growing trend of youth-led lawsuits against government policies on climate change. Earlier this year, Hawaii became the first state to enter into a decarbonization settlement with youth plaintiffs, setting challenging goals for reducing transportation emissions by 2045.
The Montana Supreme Court’s ruling is being regarded as a landmark victory for youth activists and environmental advocates. It strengthens the legal framework for future lawsuits challenging government policies that feed into climate change. With the growing youth-led climate movement, this decision is expected to impact environmental litigation in the US and worldwide.