Since the passage of the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law in 2021, lauded by President Biden as a transformative effort to revamp America’s crumbling infrastructure, concerns are mounting over the disproportionate allocation of funds towards highway expansion at the expense of public transit.
An analysis reveals that more than half of the reported funds dispersed to states, approximately $70 billion, have been directed towards the maintenance and widening of highways, while only a fifth has been allocated to public transit.
This lopsided spending, criticized by experts, is seen as exacerbating car dependence and congestion, ultimately contributing to increased greenhouse gas emissions.
Transportation for America warns that planned highway expansions could emit over 178 million tons of greenhouse gases by 2040, posing a significant threat to climate goals. Despite federal advisories to prioritize road repair over expansion and consider the impact on communities affected by air pollution, many states have continued with car-centric infrastructure projects.
The Biden administration has defended its actions, citing significant investments in public transit, passenger rail, active transportation, and zero-emission vehicles. However, critics argue that without a substantial shift in funding priorities at the state level, the nation risks further entrenching itself in a car-oriented transportation system, potentially leading to detrimental environmental consequences.
The debate underscores a pivotal moment in transportation policy, with the trajectory of emissions from the transportation sector hanging in the balance. As jurisdictions grapple with the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and lawmakers clash over infrastructure priorities, the future of public transit remains uncertain in the face of continued highway expansion.